Hi Benjamin,
On 2013-06-21 Benjamin Franksen wrote:
> Cool. However, for 3.15 I propose to change the existing
> errlogRemoveListener, instead of adding a new function; I was speculating
> on the patch being accepted for 3.14.12.4, which is why I added a new
> function.
I added the ability to delete multiple listeners, and it now returns a count
of the number actually removed.
This version (against 3.15) renames the function and adds a flags argument,
but provides an API-compatible macro for code written against 3.14, plus some
others to give it a simple API.
Comments welcome.
- Andrew
--
Advertising may be described as the science of arresting the human
intelligence long enough to get money from it. -- Stephen Leacock
- References:
- Problem in errlogRemoveListener Benjamin Franksen
- Re: Problem in errlogRemoveListener Andrew Johnson
- Re: Problem in errlogRemoveListener Benjamin Franksen
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: Using all the cores available on modern processors Mark Rivers
- Next:
Re: Using all the cores available on modern processors Pearson, Matthew R.
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
<2013>
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Problem in errlogRemoveListener Benjamin Franksen
- Next:
Re: Problem in errlogRemoveListener Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
<2013>
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|