EPICS Home
g+
g+ Communities
Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

Format page
for printing



Search Tech-talk
1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  <2000>  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  <2000>  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>
Subject: Performance of portable CA server ?
From: jennings <jennings@anl.gov>
To: <tech-talk@aps.anl.gov>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 16:30:46 -0500 
I am finding poor response times for the portable CA server.  Doing a 'get'
for a PV on an IOC gives a typical response time of about 3 msec, rising to
about 10 msec max.  Doing a 'get' for a PV on a workstation running the
'excas' example PV server gives a typical response time of about 100 msec,
rising to 600 msec max.  I get the same behavior under Solaris and under
Linux, neither workstation is heavily loaded.

Can anyone explain the difference, and is there anything I can do to improve
the performance?

Epics versions R3.13.1, R3.13.2
Workstation(s) Sparc 20 w/ Solaris & 450 MHz PII w/ Red Hat Linux 6.2
Replies:
RE: Performance of portable CA server ? Jeff Hill
Navigate by Date:
Prev: memory leak - 7/10/00 cpu used is 74.7% normally 61-62% luchini
Next: RE: Performance of portable CA server ? Jeff Hill
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  <2000>  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: RE: memory leak - 7/10/00 cpu used is 74.7% normally 61-62% Allison, Stephanie
Next: RE: Performance of portable CA server ? Jeff Hill
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  <2000>  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013 
ANJ, 10 Aug 2010 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· EPICSv4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·